<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Why Financial Planning Is Important &#187; wealth management advice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/category/wealth-management-advice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net</link>
	<description>FIM Group Fee Only Wealth Management &#124; Traverse City, MI</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:50:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Learning Lessons</title>
		<link>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/learning-lessons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/learning-lessons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Lokken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[wealth management advice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/?p=411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I was a kid, my Dad would load my dinner plate with food and not let me leave the table until I ate everything. If I tried to convince him that I had enough and did not want to eat more, he would explain that I was lucky to have a plate full of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was a kid, my Dad would load my dinner plate with food and not let me leave the table until I ate everything. If I tried to convince him that I had enough and did not want to eat more, he would explain that I was lucky to have a plate full of food. His explanation was always the same. When he grew up in the Great Depression, he wasn’t so lucky. Frankly, at the time milk mush, and for the record, it’s awful! Milk mush is a flour and water concoction mixed up with a little oats and, if you’re really lucky, sugar and/ or cinnamon. After a bowl of milk mush, I started to get the point. I will admit, it did serve the purpose of giving the feeling of being full. Since I really didn’t want to eat milk mush again I was much more cooperative at the dinner table.</p>
<p>When I was about 12 years old, my<br />
Dad decided it was time to expand my understanding of the Depression. He pulled out an old ledger book from the cupboard and opened it to a page that he had dog-eared. He explained that this ledger was from his Dad’s grocery store. I can’t recall the year, but it was during the Depression. He had me<br />
read the page: &#8230; one chicken, two pickles, potatoes &#8230; and after each item was its price. I remember thinking, “How could a chicken cost only eight cents?” Also on that page, by the food entry, was a family name. My Dad explained to this clueless 12-year-old that this ledger was for families who had no food or money, and my Grandpa would let them charge food knowing that he had little to no chance of ever getting paid.</p>
<p>To my Dad the Depression was always yesterday, and I am sure he really wanted me to understand his Managing Manias experience of growing up during those times. But as the years passed, I began to realize that his seeming obsession with this time period was an even more important lesson of gratitude and generosity.</p>
<p>The same year that my Dad showed me the ledger, I had a Physical Education teacher, Mr. Schmitt, who also was a starter on the local university basketball team. I thought he was the coolest person I ever met. One day during recess, Mr. Schmitt had me and a few fellow sixth-graders line up at a flag pole in the school yard. He instructed us to climb to the top of the pole and then come down. My friend, Tom, was first. He jumped on the pole, wrapped his legs around it and hand-over-hand shimmied up and then down. Now that we all got the idea, could we climb</p>
<p>the pole and see who would be the fastest. After a few more successful pole climbers (and some very cocky sixth- graders), it was my turn. I was bound and determined to get up and down the pole faster than anyone else. Mr. Schmitt, however, had another idea. He instructed me to climb the pole using only my arms! I tried to argue fairness, but like the arguments with my Dad about eating all my food, I failed.</p>
<p>So I climbed up and down that pole using only my arms, and though Mr. Schmitt seemed unimpressed, I felt great about my accomplishment and started egging on my friends to do By Barry Hyman, MBA the same. Most couldn’t, so my ego grew. After all the dust settled, Mr. Schmitt pulled me aside and told me something that I will never forget: &#8220;In your life you will be asked to do things you never thought you could do, but you can, just like climbing a pole without legs.&#8221; As time passed, I realized that just like my Dad’s lesson, this wasn’t about me. It was a lesson of effort, ingenuity and persistence.</p>
<p>Frequently, I think about my Dad’s lesson of gratitude and generosity, and Mr. Schmitt’s lesson of rising above the challenge, and I feel very blessed. A long time has passed since then, and years have gone by in a blink of an eye. My Dad’s gone now, and I don’t know where Mr. Schmitt is, but I’ve learned that despite all of life’s challenges, being able to view each day with an attitude of gratitude, generosity and persistence has come in very handy.</p>
<p>Despite recessions, bank failures, massive government debt, terrorist attacks and other negative situations, the human condition continues to improve &#8230; as does our economic condition. Let’s all take a minute to reflect back, and I hope you will agree that we continue to make progress. Progress can be a bit slow sometimes, but maybe now we are learning a lesson in patience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/learning-lessons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Love at First Sight</title>
		<link>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/love-at-first-sight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/love-at-first-sight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sutherland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[wealth management advice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lyrics from the traditional Christmas song &#8220;Do You Hear What I Hear,&#8221; specifically &#8220;do you see what I see,&#8221; have been replaying in my head during the last month as we continuously see opportunities and monitor our portfolios daily. The current market activity has naturally spurred many conversations with clients regarding specific holdings and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lyrics from the traditional Christmas song &#8220;Do You Hear What I Hear,&#8221; specifically &#8220;do you see what I see,&#8221; have been replaying in my head during the last month as we continuously see opportunities and monitor our portfolios daily. The current market activity has naturally spurred many conversations with clients regarding specific holdings and overall portfolio construction. Therefore, I thought it would be helpful for me to take time to review our portfolios and provide a snapshot of some current FIM Group holdings. If I ever start to worry about our investments, I simply run through each and every one. Before bed, I typically review the key components of the news stream that could impact the portfolios and potentially cause us to take action. Analyzing the investments and their characteristics better prepare us when responding to market fluctuations and media mania. Clients hire us because of our &#8220;manager must manage&#8221; philosophy and our history of being on the right side of the “making money by effectively managing investments” practice.</p>
<p>At FIM Group, our current strategy is built around a muddle through, lowgrowth overall economy. So you will notice that there are few banks, retailers and manufacturers in your portfolios. Those industries are highly affected by the hyper-competitive environment we now live in, especially because of consumers’ desires to “just say no” to a new TV, pair of shoes, bigger house or La-Z-Boy. There are pockets of strength, like telecommunications, food, energy, entertainment and technology, but it’s not easy for any industry. We can’t just buy windmills or an energy company. Nuclear energy is on its way out, and renewable energy is in, but as any seller or manufacturer of solar panels or windmills will tell you, the “permitting process” of a project (i.e., sourcing, manufacturing and logistics, and design) can take years and experience tremendous delays. To be a successful investor, patience is mandatory; it is required even if you’re right on the money, because markets are volatile and consumers are unpredictable.</p>
<p>When we review our portfolios, we certainly find comfort in the fact that we have constructed solid portfolios that should perform well in the long term. Currently we see slow to no growth (+/-2%) in the U.S. and throughout most of the developed world. This will affect both the emerging economies and the hyper-exporting economies – as all statistics indicate they will not have the torrid growth of the past. We realize that investing under a slow growth assessment and not a bullish stance has consequences. We believe now more than at many times in our history it is time to prudently and realistically look at the downside twice and upside once on each investment. Today is a time to balance opportunity-seeking with prudent risk management. We do not believe that the world will break into prosperity for all, and shrug off the banking, debt, deficit, regulations, wars, governance, poverty, unemployment, underemployment, distribution inequalities and entitlement issues that are worldwide. When it comes to the “how-to” of investing in a low-growth economy, you simply need to look for five things represented in any company’s stock:</p>
<p>   1. Hard-working, ethical and strong management<br />
   2. Quality (perhaps even great) products or services<br />
   3. Solid financials<br />
   4. Excess returns (lots of free cash flow/profits)<br />
   5. A “million” other things to fall into place depending on the specifics of the investment &#8211; which is why you hire a qualified portfolio manager</p>
<p>A Tour Around a FIM Group Portfolio</p>
<p>First, let’s travel to India, the home of Bollywood and a place where much of the world’s high-tech industry takes place. We own a Singapore-based real estate trust that owns properties in the corridors of India’s thriving hightech industry. Ascendas India REIT pays a cash dividend of more than 7%, which we expect to grow over time. Ascendas India REIT has good, skilled management, a solid balance sheet, strong growth, is located in a sector where there are barriers to entry, and can accommodate the need for infrastructure to serve the high-tech and quality needs of domestic and foreign companies. From India, let’s take a walkabout to Australia. Nearly all our Australian investments are paying well in excess of 4% current cash dividends. We own the main phone company, Telstra, which pays a nice cash dividend of 9%, Westfield REIT, which has a global</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/love-at-first-sight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was 2008 a Gift or a Curse?</title>
		<link>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/was-2008-a-gift-or-a-curse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/was-2008-a-gift-or-a-curse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Lokken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[wealth management advice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/?p=404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have had almost three years to consume, analyze, cogitate and process the financial events of 2008 and early 2009. If by some chance you have forgotten, never knew or simply chose to block out this period from your memory, let me cite 10 ways this traumatic period affected financial markets, investors and, most important, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have had almost three years to consume, analyze, cogitate and process the financial events of 2008 and early 2009. If by some chance you have forgotten, never knew or simply chose to block out this period from your memory, let me cite 10 ways this traumatic period affected financial markets, investors and, most important, our valued clients. The memorial pain of the crash of 2008-2009 includes:</p>
<p>    * The stock market dropped approximately 50% from May 31, 2008, through March 1, 2009.<br />
    * Several financial institutions in the U.S. and Europe failed because of exposure to bad mortgages (subprime) and the securitization of these mortgages via a Wall Street product called credit default swaps (CDS).<br />
    * Financial companies named Lehman, Countrywide, Wachovia, Washington Mutual and Bear Stearns, along with many others, disappeared.<br />
    * Insurance giant AIG was saved by massive government injections of cash.<br />
    * The Reserve Money Market Fund broke a $1 when several companies that issued commercial paper defaulted.<br />
    * Iceland faced financial collapse only to be saved by an emergency loan from the International Monetary Fund.<br />
    * Beginning the week of October 6, 2008, the stock market closed consecutively lower each of the five trading days on record-breaking trading volume. The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost almost 18% in that week, allowing historians to name it “Black Week.” The Dow, which closed at values in excess of 12,500 in May 2008, closed that week at 8,451.<br />
    * By March 2009, the Dow reached a low under 6,500.<br />
    * The news media reported daily the number of bank failures and rising unemployment rate.<br />
    * For historical reference, the period was named the “Great Recession” in an effort to draw comparisons to the “Great Depression” of the 1930s.</p>
<p>I could expand this list and make us all sick just remembering the financial trauma of this period, but I’ll show mercy and move onto the subject of this article: Was this period a gift or a curse?</p>
<p>My opinion is that this period was a gift because it made us all more reasonable. Here’s why:</p>
<p>    * Asset prices reset to more reasonable levels, which allowed investors to make investments that have long-term opportunity and good dividends.<br />
    * Companies became more concerned with sustaining their business long-term, so they became more efficient by reducing costs and debt, and they learned to make money selling less.<br />
    * Consumers understood the risk of borrowing too much, and that even the price of real estate doesn’t always go up.<br />
    * Consumers understood the need to save for a rainy day.<br />
    * The word “guarantee” is now met with a wise sense of suspicion.<br />
    * The reasonable value of an asset is now viewed more from a cash flow opportunity perspective than its closing price.</p>
<p>When this era ends and historians evaluate it, I am hopeful it will be viewed as a period when we took the necessary financial medicine and realized that we should only buy assets when they are cheap, save money to reduce risk, pay down debt with discipline and spend less than we make.</p>
<p>The basics should be obvious now to those who are living through this period. It makes for a great investment opportunity going forward, because we can now be realistic and not live in a bubble. The Great Recession was a gift to the rational and wise investor, and hopefully it eliminated financial goofiness, at least for awhile. The future looks better because it can now be reviewed with reason and wisdom, not foolish expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/was-2008-a-gift-or-a-curse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courage</title>
		<link>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/courage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/courage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sutherland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[wealth management advice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/?p=400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Now we wait.” “What?” The client asked. “We wait. We collect dividends, and we let our investments grow.” “But we have a new [former actor] president, interest rates are high, unemployment is rising, the dollar is getting crushed and inflation is out of control!” “We wait.” Years ago I remember having a conversation similar to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Now we wait.”</p>
<p>“What?” The client asked.</p>
<p>“We wait. We collect dividends, and we let our investments grow.”</p>
<p>“But we have a new [former actor] president, interest rates are high, unemployment is rising, the dollar is getting crushed and inflation is out of control!”</p>
<p>“We wait.”</p>
<p>Years ago I remember having a conversation similar to the one above with a client. It was the last time I said, “Now we wait,” regarding investing, because he interpreted that statement as, “Buy ’em and forget ’em.” Nothing is further from the truth. At FIM Group we constantly monitor each holding, the macro environment, industries, government policies, each company’s products, services, strategy and competition. This is part of our normal business scanning. And we don’t worry when the price action goes against us. Not only do we not worry, but on the contrary, having done our research to give us deep conviction, we savor those opportunities to buy more of what has more value. As Barry Hyman points out in his article (see page 4), buying at the right(bargain) price is key.</p>
<p>In past issues of our newsletter, I have discussed “behavioral” investing, a topic in which I have been a believer long before economists and financial gurus considered it a science. Back then, we labeled it “mania behavior” or “emotional investing.” In the past I have also discussed the “dark horsemen” of investing: Recency effect (placing more weight on recent history than on the entire history); endowment behavior (our predisposition to hold onto our investments); heretics (misplaced inferences based on random events or experiences); and other perils of investing. Investors often want to trade companies – not based on their investments or worth, but rather on their price action. Thankfully Wall Street brokers readily oblige this desire, because trades result in new commissions after all.</p>
<p>“Basically, price fluctuations have only one significant meaning for the true investor. They provide him with an opportunity to buy wisely when prices fall sharply and to sell wisely when they advance a great deal. At other times he will do better if he forgets about the stock market and pays attention to his dividend returns and to the operating results of his companies.”<br />
– Benjamin Graham</p>
<p>Sadly, though, this behavior is at epidemic proportions, even for the wealthiest of investors. The June 10, 2011, issue of The Financial Times had an article titled “Self Control Is the Key to an Investor’s Life.” The author drew on a Barclays Wealth study of 2,000 wealthy investors ($2,500,000+ in investments) and found that many (40%) tried to “time” the market by selling and buying often. One-third felt they needed to buy and sell often to be successful. On the other extreme, two-thirds of the respondents said that they have bought illiquid investments (e.g., real estate, annuities, partnerships) so they did not have to make a “buy or sell” decision. 76% resorted to avoidance strategies such as avoiding the news, or not looking at their investment statements. I inferred from the article that the 2,000 investors surveyed had poor results.</p>
<p>Art of War</p>
<p>Does it take courage to invest? I wonder if it is skill or just plain common sense that guides the successful investor toward good, consistent returns. I think the following statement from the ancient Chinese military treatise Art of War sums up the point and compels me to replace “courage” with “seasoned expert”:</p>
<p>“Thus the expert in battle moves the enemy [emotions, in the case of investing] and is not moved by him [his own emotions].” – Sun Tzu</p>
<p>My 20-year-old daughter is a dive master, and I have been scuba diving for nearly 30 years. Over Christmas break we went on a cave dive. On the plane ride home, a woman overheard us talking about the dive and said, “Gosh, I could never muster up the courage [to dive in a scary, dark, water-filled cave].” My daughter and I looked at each other, and she turned to the woman and said something to the effect of, “When diving, you’re safe because you’re trained. You also have a dive buddy who’s both a dive master and an expert on the cave. You follow a rope to prevent getting lost, and when you have two-thirds of your air left in your tank, you head back to the surface where someone is waiting.” My daughter and I have done more than 100 dives each, and we don’t dive if the conditions aren’t right or we sense any danger.</p>
<p>“Have the courage of your knowledge and experience. If you have formed a conclusion from the facts and if you know your judgment is sound, act on it – even though others may hesitate or differ. You are neither right nor wrong because the crowd disagrees with you. You are right because your data and reasoning are right.” – Benjamin Graham</p>
<p>We Will Be Patient With Our Holdings and Wait</p>
<p>There are more than 50,000 stocks, there are millions of bonds and there are tens of millions of other investments such as real estate, commodities, gold, etc. Some of these investments are worthless, and some are gems. Some are “safer” than others at different times, depending on the prevalent business, economic currents, investing climate and, of course, the ever-present emotionally charged investor psychology.</p>
<p>As Barry points out in his article, there are many great investments that have great characteristics – very compelling attributes as investments – but alas they are sitting on the “bargain table.” Thankfully, everything is cyclical, and eventually investors will be attracted into good, solid investments like those Barry highlights. Their prices will go up, and we will sell them when they get to a price that is too high based on a price-to-value analysis. In the meantime, we will collect our income and dividends, let management do “their thing” and we will, with diligence and strategic patience … wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/courage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All in a Day’s Work</title>
		<link>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/all-in-a-day%e2%80%99s-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/all-in-a-day%e2%80%99s-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Lokken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[wealth management advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best wealth management firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversified portfolio manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIM Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial & Investment Management Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[successful investment strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/all-in-a-day%e2%80%99s-work/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love coming to the office. Nearly every day, standard tasks are to first review current investment positions online at Bloomberg and then check out the latest news. Then I review the transactions in client portfolios, including cash balances. Next, I review the performance of investments &#8211; daily, year to date and long term. Finally, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love coming to the office. Nearly every day, standard tasks are to first review current investment positions online at Bloomberg and then check out the latest news. Then I review the transactions in client portfolios, including cash balances. Next, I review the performance of investments &ndash; daily, year to date and long term. Finally, I tackle my e-mail, prepare for appointments, make notes after the appointments and field phone calls while tending to a few more tasks.<br/><br/>I believe that staying informed and on top of the market, and monitoring investment portfolios in relation to market activity, is paramount in any <a href="http://fimg.net/services/investment-management">successful investment strategy</a>. In my case, doing so gives me a better grasp of my portfolios, client situations and market changes, which provide added value for both myself and my clients. Being proactive and making informed, rational investment decisions yield positive results and lets our clients maintain the lifestyles they choose. I experience excitement daily when challenging situations arise, because for me they are more like &ldquo;learning opportunities.&rdquo;<br/><br/>&nbsp;<a href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/snd-store/354029/original.jpg"><img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/snd-store/354029/original.jpg" style="float: right;" /></a><br/><br/>In retrospect, I can think of only two periods in my last 30 years in the financial business where my daily &ldquo;ritual&rdquo; was affected dramatically. The first, which I call the period of &ldquo;uber-irrational exuberance,&rdquo; was in the closing months of 1999 and the early months of 2000. Stocks, in particular technology stocks, were on a tear. Amazingly, stock prices of companies with no history of sales, and certainly no profits, were rising daily.<br/><br/>The second period, which I call the &ldquo;end-of-the-world&rdquo; period, was from the fall of 2008 through March of 2009, and was characterized by stock prices falling virtually daily. During the end of this period, investors were running for cover by selling stocks and putting the cash proceeds into &ldquo;safe&rdquo; U.S. government securities and bank deposits. Investor behavior during these two periods epitomizes the manic extremes of investment hype (uber-irrational exuberance) and investment depression (end of the world) in a very contrary manner. The investor behavior displayed in these two periods needs to be carefully considered by those now making longterm investments in the stock market, because <strong>a good understanding of the extremes of investor behavior can lead a wise investor to making significant profits</strong>.<br/><br/>During the days of &ldquo;uber-irrational exuberance,&rdquo; investors wanted to make investments in stocks regardless of the cost and opportunity for profit. In reality this was not an investment opportunity, it was all hype. Once investors realized that the emperor wasn&rsquo;t wearing any clothes, the stock market corrected the prices of profitless companies and collapsed very quickly. To say the least, it was a challenge being a fundamental (value) investment manager before the price correction. Value managers were in investment depression, because there truly was little future opportunity in stocks, and buying into highflying, profitless companies was not rational. In many cases, clients of value managers demanded higher returns and left. The Warren Buffetts and John Templetons of the world struggled. In their wisdom they warned investors, but it seems they were ignored.<br/><br/>To the contrary, during the &ldquo;endof- the-world&rdquo; period, investors sold assets regardless of their value. Value managers were in investment heaven with the opportunity to buy companies at such low prices. As money left stocks, value managers seized the opportunities. Level-headed investors, like the cash-rich Berkshire Hathaway, took complete advantage of this buying opportunity and invested billions of dollars into preferred shares General Electric and <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldman_Sachs">Goldman Sachs</a>&nbsp;with a coupon of 10% and the opportunity to convert into common stock at low historical prices.<br/><br/>In conclusion (and to finally make my point), as value managers we are unhappy when stock prices are uberirrationally high and happy when prices of stocks are low and reflect end-of-the-world pricing. This makes for long days when trying to explain to clients why you are happy, because stock prices are low and unhappy when prices are high. When it&rsquo;s all about investor behavior, and not profits, the day can get a little tough.<br/><br/>But the good news is that most of the time, stock prices are &ldquo;normal,&rdquo; and buyers and sellers meet in a reasonably rational marketplace to exchange ownership of companies for cash, and vice versa. I would argue that the current market environment is a &ldquo;subnormal&rdquo; market. Certainly no mania of uber-irrational or end-of-the-world extremes is prevalent in today&rsquo;s stock prices. However, investor behavior is still dampened by the pain of 2008/2009 losses, and investors have all but forgotten the late 1990s exuberance. The price of stocks reflects a reasonable future opportunity where companies will profit from the increasing rising global standard of living. Therefore, the prices of selective companies are modestly cheap. That is good for us at <a href="http://fimg.net/">FIM Group</a>, because we can consistently make investments at reasonable prices, collect dividends and go about our normal day without the interruption of having to manage extreme investor behavior.</p>
<p><img width="0" style="display:none;border:0;" src="http://tracker.sendible.com/messages/e80e24e7-f651-415a-a740-aaa0e86d6a20?service=Wordpress&#038;f=840198&#038;view=true" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/all-in-a-day%e2%80%99s-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Options for Grandparents Wanting to Help Pay for Their Grandchildren’s College Education</title>
		<link>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/options-for-grandparents-wanting-to-help-pay-for-their-grandchildren%e2%80%99s-college-education/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/options-for-grandparents-wanting-to-help-pay-for-their-grandchildren%e2%80%99s-college-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Frye</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[wealth management advice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Helping to pay for college education is one of the best gifts grandparents can give their grandchildren. As the cost of a college education continues to increase, many grandparents are stepping in to assist. If done correctly, this is also a great way to pass on wealth without having to pay gift and estate taxes. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helping to pay for college education is one of the best gifts grandparents can give their grandchildren. As the cost of a college education continues to increase, many grandparents are stepping in to assist. If done correctly, this is also a great way to pass on wealth without having to pay gift and estate taxes. This article will highlight some of the common options for grandparents.</p>
<p>Outright Gifts</p>
<p>Under the current tax rules, a grandparent can give up to $13,000 annually to a grandchild free from estate tax or gift tax ($26,000 per grandchild if both grandparents contribute). This method is simple and easy, but it has some drawbacks. First, you are giving up control of the funds to your grandchild, who could use them for a purpose other than college. Another drawback is an outright gift becomes an asset of the grandchild, which could reduce the amount of available financial aid. Federal financial aid formulas require students to contribute 20% of their assets each year toward college costs. Alternatively, an outright gift to the parents for their child’s education may be preferable, since parents are expected to contribute a maximum of 5.6% of their assets toward their child’s college costs.</p>
<p>Pay Tuition Directly</p>
<p>A great way to help pay for college costs is to pay the college directly. Tuition payments made directly to the college are not considered taxable gifts, no matter how large the payment. However, this applies only to tuition costs – room and board, books and other fees are not considered qualified expenses for this treatment. Direct payment of tuition does not count toward the $13,000 annual gift tax exclusion, so in addition you would be able to give your grandchild a tax-free gift up to $13,000 per year. Another advantage over the outright gift is that this method will ensure the funds are used for college. One drawback is the college may reduce the student’s financial aid by the amount of the payment. If this is a consideration, you should check with the college to see how a direct payment may affect eligibility for school-based aid.</p>
<p>529 College Savings Plan</p>
<p>This can be an excellent way for grandparents to assist with financing a grandchild’s college education. A 529 college savings plan is a state-sponsored plan that invests the money on behalf of the participants. Under current law, contributions to the plan grow tax-deferred, and withdrawals that are used for qualified education expenses are tax-free. Qualified expenses include tuition, room and board (must be enrolled at least half time), books and fees. It is important to note, however, that if funds are used for something other than qualified education expenses, the earnings portion will be charged a 10% penalty and taxed at your ordinary income tax rate. Grandparents can open an account and name a grandchild as beneficiary, or they can contribute to an existing account. One advantage unique to 529 plans is that a donor can consolidate five years worth of tax-free investing into a single year ($65,000 lump sum gift by an individual; $130,000 joint gift by married couples), as long as they don’t make additional gifts to the beneficiary in the five-year period. This allows for investing a lot of money up front that can grow for the grandchild. The funds can be used for any accredited college. You can join any state’s plan, but there are often state tax benefits, such as deduction for contributions, which provide an incentive to participate in your in-state plan. View the other advantages of a 529 college savings plan below.</p>
<p>Help with college costs is a wonderful gift to give a grandchild. Before giving away your assets, however, it is critical to ensure that your own goals and lifestyle expenses are adequately funded. Your grandchild has a number of other options available for paying for college – such as loans, scholarships, financial aid and work programs – and you always have the option of helping to repay loans after they have graduated, if the resources are available. Alternatively, your options for funding a secure and comfortable retirement if your resources have been depleted are limited.</p>
<p>Future changes in tax law will likely affect some of the benefits of these approaches. Feel free to contact a FIM Group financial adviser if you have questions or would like to further explore whether one of these options may be right for you.<br />
​ </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/options-for-grandparents-wanting-to-help-pay-for-their-grandchildren%e2%80%99s-college-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q&amp;A with Barry Hyman in the Honolulu Star Advertiser</title>
		<link>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/qa-with-barry-hyman-in-the-honolulu-star-advertiser/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/qa-with-barry-hyman-in-the-honolulu-star-advertiser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sutherland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[wealth management advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best wealth management firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversified portfolio manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIM Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margin of Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/qa-with-barry-hyman-in-the-honolulu-star-advertiser/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is the transcript of an interview with Barry Hyman published in the Star Advertiser on March 27, in its entirety and original order. Q) Have investors missed the boat to get into stocks following a two-year rally in the stock market?A) It is important to define Investors as opposed to Speculators. Speculators try [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/snd-store/311857/original.jpg"><img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/snd-store/311857/original.jpg" style="float: right;" /></a>The following is the transcript of an interview with Barry Hyman published in the Star Advertiser on March 27, in its entirety and original order. </em><br/><br/><em><strong>Q) Have investors missed the boat to get into stocks following a two-year rally in the stock market?</strong></em><br/><br/><strong>A)</strong> It is important to define Investors as opposed to Speculators. Speculators try to predict things such as timing markets and the behavior of other market participants. Investors, by my definition, do not. A <a href="http://www.fimg.net/services">wise investor</a> weighs the merits or intrinsic value of each individual potential investment compared to the price of that investment and benefits from opportunities in which there is a large disparity, or pricing inefficiency, which not only creates a likelihood for gains but also builds in a &ldquo;<a href="http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/margin-of-safety/">margin of safety</a>.&rdquo; In that context there are always opportunities from which to benefit rather than worrying about missed boats.<br/><br/><em><strong>Q) There are more index and sector funds than ever before. Is this a good way to invest?</strong></em><br/><br/><strong>A)</strong> Not in my opinion. To me it makes a lot more sense to analyze each investment one at a time and invest only in those whose value exceeds their market price by a sufficient margin, than to invest in all of the investments in a particular sector or market index and end up owning the good, the bad and the overvalued. I&rsquo;d rather not own the investments that are overvalued or whose products, management, ethics, integrity, business model or competitive factors are lacking.<br/><br/><em><strong>Q) Should investors be concerned about the fallout from Japan and, conversely, has the Japan situation created buying opportunities?</strong></em><br/><br/><strong>A) </strong>The tragedy in Japan is horrible. First and foremost my heart is heavy and my compassion goes out to all the families who lost loved ones and those who are suffering. As an investor, the answer to both questions is &ldquo;yes.&rdquo; Investors should weigh all factors, especially risks. At the same time risks, and others&rsquo; overreaction to them, create opportunities. In the case of Japan, investors need to be cautious when contemplating investments in companies that are extremely adversely affected by the tragedy. But at the same time the overreaction by investors has created tremendous opportunities. For example, from its peak level in February to the intraday low on March 15, the <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikkei_225">Nikkei </a>index of Japanese stocks dropped nearly 25%. In that mass hysteria panic selling of Japanese stocks, prices of companies that had little or no financial exposure to the catastrophe fell along with those whose fortunes were adversely affected. Investors who are able to do the analysis and are willing to take advantage of the opportunities created by others&rsquo; emotional behavior stand to benefit greatly. It is the classic wealth transfer scenario.<br/><br/><em><strong>Q) Where can seniors, or people with fixed income, invest who don&rsquo;t want to risk their money in stocks?</strong></em><br/><br/>A) This is definitely a conundrum. With interest rates forced as low as they are by Central Bank policies in the U.S. and Europe, people on a fixed income need to be wise. No fixed-income asset class that pays decent income is without risk of principal in this environment. Those with limited risk of principal provide very little income and present risk to purchasing power from the inflation that is and will continue to result from &ldquo;easy&rdquo; Central Bank policy. So back to the first answer: one must be a nimble and skilled investor in this environment, evaluate each investment one at a time and construct an investment portfolio that balances risks while providing required income, in the form of total return.<br/><br/><strong><em>Q) If buying CDs, should people go with shorter-term investments in anticipation that rates will rise going forward?</em></strong><br/><br/><strong>A)</strong> This is akin to asking what direction the market is headed. There is not a simple one-size-fits-all answer. In response to the Central Bank policies of keeping short-term rates, the bond market is expecting inflation to continue to rise, and in response has already driven longer-term rates up considerably. Who is to say whether they will keep rising? When the Federal Reserve&rsquo;s &ldquo;quantitative easing&rdquo; policy ends, history tells us economic growth will likely slow, and thus longer-term rates may fall rather than continue to rise. So instead of trying to time such movements, investors are better advised to build and manage well-constructed portfolios that balance risks and take advantage of pricing opportunities, even in the fixed-income area.</p>
<p><img width="0" style="display:none;border:0;" src="http://tracker.sendible.com/messages/65473041-c554-426b-930d-68dd90524896?service=Wordpress&#038;f=840198&#038;view=true" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/qa-with-barry-hyman-in-the-honolulu-star-advertiser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Company Pie</title>
		<link>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/company-pie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/company-pie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sutherland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[wealth management advice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is tough being a business. Everyone wants a piece of your profits and resources. Everyone has an opinion on how you should behave as a company. At one extreme you have employees and management, and at the other you have the shareholders. Customers want a great value equation, and politicians want political contributions. Everyone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is tough being a business. Everyone wants a piece of your profits and resources. Everyone has an opinion on how you should behave as a company. At one extreme you have employees and management, and at the other you have the shareholders. Customers want a great value equation, and politicians want political contributions. Everyone is pulling at the resources of the company – and many are sapping its strength and viability.</p>
<p>In recent years we have seen many examples of how companies management sacrificed shareholders for their own benefit (e.g., the “too big to fail” banks and brokers). We have also seen the eroding effect of noncompetitive labor agreements evidenced by how Michigan has lost thousands of jobs to other states. Now gone are the firms that risked their long-term stability to pump up their bonus pools, or said “yes” to self-defeating labor agreements because the short-term rewards were so extravagant that risking it all (and the future jobs of average workers) was “worth” it for the few. Some companies risk the stability of entire countries for the pursuit of growth – others will have two value systems: one for their domestic market and one for everyone else.Interdependence</p>
<p>Often, the stakeholders’ attitude toward virtue with regards to serving the other groups is “I must advocate for my group” – not realizing that there is an extreme interdependence among the groups. They all need one another. Ethical behavior toward one’s own group but not the others causes a diminishing value of the business. Companies’ and societies’ prescription for managing this tension are “rules.” They create a rules-driven paradigm that is “values-neutral.” For example, some well-meaning mortgage companies, investors and others created incentives to help everyone achieve the “American dream” of home ownership, and laws, rules, regulations and incentives/disincentives were created for this purpose. Because hindsight is 20/20, we see that this resulted in hyped property values fueled by property debts, more and more homes being built, and a completely false economy built on good intentions. Municipalities were certainly happy, because higher property prices meant higher taxes. Labor was happy because there were jobs. And adding to the fun, homeowners used their home equity like an ATM. As I like to tell my children, “A little ice cream is great – too much ice cream will make you sick.”</p>
<p>Laws and Practical Wisdom</p>
<p>There is no law that says, “You should live prudently.” There is no law that says, “Just say no to excess debt.” There is no law that says labor should ask for less or customers should willingly pay more. There is no law that caps prices on housing. We should not (and really can’t) have laws that force people to have common sense or Aristotle’s “practical wisdom.” Could we conceivably pass a law that makes it so that people won’t be silly, naïve, short-sighted or selfdefeating? How? Who would judge this? Last night, while researching “choice” on the Internet, I found a TED talk by Barry Schwartz about our loss of wisdom (www. ted.com/talks/barry_schwartz_on_our_loss_of_ wisdom.html). Barry discussed the need for Aristotle’s practical wisdom as an “antidote for a society gone mad with bureaucracy.” In the well-presented talk he elaborated on how rules often fail us and incentives can backfire (e.g., the U.S. housing fiasco), and how a return to practical virtues, common sense and “everyday wisdom” can help rebuild our world.</p>
<p>Values-Neutral</p>
<p>I often see this values-neutral “law” issue with investors, employees, management and other stakeholders. I believe “valuesneutral” is a practice. I also believe that companies and societies that thrive place a more balanced emphasis on realizing we are interdependent and in this together. The balanced attitude would place “doing the right thing” over “doing whatever it takes, as long as its legal” in the pursuit of success. Warren Buffett, CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, said, “I look for three things in hiring people: First, personal integrity; second, intelligence; and third, a high energy level.” He went on to say that if integrity is not there, then the other two don’t matter. I think that if you were to identify one core “value” that has affected FIM Group’s performance most, it is the fact that FIM Group is not “values-neutral.” We believe virtue matters, and I personally believe it has helped our performance. Through the economic panics and crises over the years we’ve had negative swings in our portfolios’ values, but we’ve also avoided complete loss caused by lack of ethics or virtue in the companies we invest in. As our clients are aware, we don’t invest in tobacco companies. Why? First, we don’t wish to profit from a product that kills people. There are plenty of investments that don’t kill people with their products. Second, integrity and virtue. Who works for companies that knowingly make products that kill people? People who say, “Yes my company has lied to the public for years about the [cancer] risks of our products, but you can trust us with your investment, because we are honest about our books and are virtuous in the way we treat our shareholders.”</p>
<p>Trust</p>
<p>I think that trust is part of the DNA of great companies. When you read about economic thought leaders like Adam Smith, Thomas Malthus, John Stuart Mill, John Maynard Keynes, Andrew Carnegie and even Milton Friedman, it is easy to wonder if the idea of trust as a basis of the “normal” business world’s landscape was just taken for granted like air, water, money, governance or marriage. I think that while trust has always been a “big deal” in the past, it might have been historically taken for granted as a normal assumption about business. Today more than ever we want to trust something. It seems like at every corner the behaviors of those we trusted – government, industry, business and even our sports heroes – have shaken the foundations. Going forward, I believe that companies that will thrive in the long-term will be driven by leaders, managers and employees who you can trust. A friend of mine is a leadership training consultant. She lives in Detroit, but when she’s in Traverse City we will usually have tea and discuss business topics. Our last conversation was about (as always) “leadership,” but specifically this time it was about leadership attributes and the characteristics of leadership. She outlined the 13 behaviors Steven M. R. Covey champions, and we added a few of our own based on our own values formed by our ethical, spiritual and religious influences. Trust, like “brand value,” is part of a company’s currency of success, especially in the new economy that is emerging due to the extreme transparency that exists today. Simply, companies that try to “hide” their lack of character will fail, because consumers will avoid their products. Companies earn people’s trust through demonstration, i.e., by “walking the walk.” And trustworthy companies will thrive.</p>
<p>Of course there are fools born every minute, and many will buy products and services from ignorant companies. Those companies will thrive for a short period. There will always be exceptions that can be pointed to prove that ethics and virtue don’t matter. At FIM Group, however, we are long-term investors and without a doubt believe that long-term ethics and virtue truly matter.<br />
The More Things Change</p>
<p>Throughout history our religious leaders, philosophers and teachers have been consistent about the importance of ethics, virtue, and thoughtful, commonsense- infused action. Today’s world economy is moving at light speed compared to when Aristotle, Moses, Buddha and Jesus walked our planet, but the principals of moral behavior are as true and solid today as they were back when these folks walked barefoot on our earth. Of course, the natural tension between society, employers, owners and such is nothing new. Jesus threw the money changers and other unethical business people from the church steps, and Buddha spoke of the importance of right behavior and the noble characteristics toward purposeful choices. Today, consumers will choose companies they can trust. The best and the brightest will work for companies they can be proud of. Governments will want more, consumers will want a better deal and owners will want more profits. I guess some things will never change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/company-pie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charitable Giving</title>
		<link>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/charitable-giving/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/charitable-giving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 13:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sutherland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[wealth management advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charitable Giving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity retirement plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donating retirement to charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donating to charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIM Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement plan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/charitable-giving/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent natural disasters in Haiti and Japan may have you appreciating life a little more and wondering what you can do to help others in need. Philanthropy not only gives you great personal satisfaction, it also gives you an income tax deduction, lets you avoid capital gains tax and reduces the amount of tax [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent natural disasters in Haiti and Japan may have you appreciating life a little more and wondering what you can do to help others in need. Philanthropy not only gives you great personal satisfaction, it also gives you an income tax deduction, lets you avoid capital gains tax and reduces the amount of tax your estate may owe upon your death.<br/><br/>There are many ways to give charitably: You can make gifts during your lifetime or upon your death; you can make gifts outright or use a trust; you can name/ designate a charity as a beneficiary in your will, <a href="http://www.fimg.net/services/401k-retirement">retirement plan </a>or life insurance policy; or, if your gift is substantial, you can establish a private foundation, community foundation or donor-advised fund.<br/><br/><em><strong>Making Outright Gifts<a href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/snd-store/311755/original.png"><img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/snd-store/311755/original.png" style="float: right;" /></a></strong></em><br/><br/>An outright gift is one that benefits the charity immediately and exclusively. With an outright gift you may receive an income and gift tax deduction, if you itemize your deductions and meet certain criteria. Generally, you can deduct cash contributions in full up to 50% of your adjusted gross income, and contributions of long-term appreciated capital gain assets in full up to 30% of your adjusted gross income. Charitable contributions in excess of these limits can be carried over to the following tax year, for a maximum of five years.<br/><br/><em>Tip: Make sure the charity is a qualified charity, according to IRS guidelines. Get a written receipt or keep a bank record for any cash donations, and get a written receipt for any donations other than money (e.g., property, vehicles, etc.).</em><br/><br/><strong><em>Will or Trust Bequests and Beneficiary Designations</em></strong><br/><br/>These gifts are made by including a provision in your will or trust document, or by completing a beneficiary designation form. The charity receives the gift after your death, at which time your estate may take the income and estate tax deductions.<br/><br/><em><strong>Charitable Trusts</strong></em><br/><br/>Another way for you to make charitable gifts is to create a charitable trust. You can name the charity as the sole beneficiary, or you can name a non-charitable beneficiary as well, splitting the beneficial interest (this is referred to as making a partial charitable gift). The most common types of trusts used to make partial gifts to charity are charitable lead trusts and charitable remainder trusts.<br/><br/><strong><em>Charitable Lead Trust</em></strong><br/><br/>A charitable lead trust pays income to a charity for a specified period (generally in years), and then the trust principal passes back to you, your family members or other heirs. The trust is known as a charitable lead trust because the charity gets the first, or lead, interest.<br/><br/>A charitable lead trust can be an excellent estate planning vehicle if you own assets that you expect will substantially appreciate in value. If created properly, a charitable lead trust allows you to keep an asset in the family and still enjoy some tax benefits. Income from the trust goes to the charity, and at the trust&rsquo;s end the balance goes to you and your family.<br/><br/><strong><em>Charitable Remainder Trust</em></strong><br/><br/>A charitable remainder trust is the mirror image of the charitable lead trust. Trust income is payable to you, your family members or other heirs for a specified period (generally in years), then the principal goes to your favorite charity. A charitable remainder trust can be beneficial because it provides you with an immediate stream of income &ndash; a desirable feature if there isn&rsquo;t adequate income from other sources. Income from the trust goes to you and your family first, and at the trust&rsquo;s end the balance goes to the charity.<br/><br/><em><strong>Private Family Foundation</strong></em><br/><br/>A private family <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_(nonprofit_organization)">foundation</a> is a separate legal entity that can endure for many generations after your death. You create the foundation then transfer assets to the foundation, which in turn makes grants to public charities. You and your descendants have complete control over which charities receive grants. But, unless you can contribute enough capital to generate funds for grants, the costs and complexities of a private family foundation may not be worth the effort.<br/><br/><em>Tip: One rule of thumb is that you should be able to donate enough assets to generate at least $25,000 a year for grants</em>.<br/><br/><em><strong>Community Foundation</strong></em><br/><br/>If you want your dollars to be spent on improving the quality of life in a particular community, consider giving to a community foundation. Similar to a private family foundation, a community foundation accepts donations from many sources and is overseen by individuals familiar with the community&rsquo;s particular needs and professionals skilled at running a charitable foundation.<br/><br/><em><strong>Donor-Advised Fund</strong></em><br/><br/>Similar in some respects to a private family foundation, a donor-advised fund offers an easier way for you to make a significant gift to charity over a long period of time. A donor-advised fund actually refers to an account that is held within a charitable organization. The charitable organization is a separate legal entity, but your account is not &ndash; it is merely a component of the charitable organization that holds the account. Once you transfer assets to the account, the charitable organization becomes the legal owner of the assets and has ultimate control over them. You may only advise &ndash; not direct &ndash; the organization as to how your contributions should be distributed to other charities.<br/><br/><em><strong>Donating IRA-Required Minimum Distributions</strong></em><br/><br/>For the past several years, IRA owners age 70&frac12; and older have been able to take a tax-free distribution of up to $100,000 from their traditional IRAs and donate it to a charity. The money must be transferred directly from the IRA to the charity. This strategy helps reduce the tax due on the IRA withdrawal, and it is especially beneficial for those who do not itemize deductions on their tax returns. The amount of the donation is not included in adjusted gross income, which can help in qualifying for some other benefits (Medicare Part B and Part D premiums are based on AGI). It is possible that this benefit will continue to be extended in the coming years.<br/><br/><em><strong>How We Can Help</strong></em><br/><br/>Gifting highly appreciated assets may be a better option than gifting cash. Trust accounts and donor-advised fund accounts can be set up at Schwab. Simply contact your FIM Group representative to help you identify assets and complete the necessary paperwork.Please consult a qualified tax advisor before implementing any of these gifting strategies.</p>
<p><img width="0" style="display:none;border:0;" src="http://tracker.sendible.com/messages/8091bcfc-5165-4de1-ac33-a9496b5cfa1d?service=Wordpress&#038;f=840198&#038;view=true" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/charitable-giving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Without Oversimplifying</title>
		<link>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/understanding-without-oversimplifying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/understanding-without-oversimplifying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 16:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sutherland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[wealth management advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIM Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/understanding-without-oversimplifying/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not going to discuss inflation in this month&#8217;s article. Why? Because it is predictable. Inflation was a popular topic during my formative years before FIM Group was founded. I was in my mid-20s when President Ronald Reagan had Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker save us from inflation. For those of us old enough [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not going to discuss inflation in this month&rsquo;s article. Why? Because it is predictable. Inflation was a popular topic during my formative years before <a href="http://www.fimg.net/">FIM Group</a> was founded. I was in my mid-20s when President Ronald Reagan had Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker save us from inflation. For those of us old enough to remember, Volcker initially appeared to nearly kill our economy as he raised interest rates to the stratosphere in his quest to &ldquo;Whip Inflation Now.&rdquo;<br/><br/>Rather than discussing inflation, I want you to think about the fact that no one believed Volcker could rid the economy of high inflation. Volcker tightened the monetary policy and dropped the inflation rate by 8.7% in two years, even with the major tax cut of 1981. Unfortunately, many believed his efforts would have a negative impact. This lack of trust drove purchases of gold and real estate, all often bought with debt and borrowed at high rates. These folks felt that, based on historical trends of everincreasing inflation/interest rates, it was rational to pay more today because tomorrow will be even worse, and Volcker&rsquo;s rhetoric was not going to convince them otherwise.<br/><br/>During our FIM Group Currency Webinar, recorded on May 4th, we discussed gold, inflation, the U.S. dollar and other related topics. But for now I&rsquo;d like to discuss how the human brain works and, more important, why billions of dollars will be made by those who realize that their beliefs can get them into trouble, especially when it comes to money.<br/><br/><em><strong><a href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/snd-store/311821/original.jpg"><img height="196" width="279" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/snd-store/311821/original.jpg" style="float: right;" /></a>It Ain&rsquo;t that Simple </strong></em><br/><br/>Everything is connected, and everything happens for more than one reason. Our brains are wired to oversimplify everything. Our world is complex, and everything changes. We think we are learning, but often we only look to our immediate surroundings.<br/><br/>To clarify the complexity theme of this article, let&rsquo;s look to Japan. If we lived in Japan, a democracy that can &ldquo;print money&rdquo; and whose economic characteristics are similar to ours, we would be concerned about a lost decade of burgeoning government debts, stagnating wages, unemployment and gridlocked leadership. Our perspective would be that of a &ldquo;<a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_War">Cold War</a>-seasoned Russian,&rdquo; and we would be concerned about our own war spending and the way military spending is crowding out investing and spending in other areas. The U.S. has increased its military spending by 81% since 2001, and now accounts for 43% of the global total, six times its nearest rival China (source: Stockholm International Research Institute). Our next ten years will be different than Japan&rsquo;s (and Russia&rsquo;s for that matter), but there also will be similarities.<br/><br/><em><strong>Emergent Systems and Path Momentum</strong></em><br/><br/>Emergent systems are both top-down and bottom-up &ndash; they try to help us see the whole, but they need to be studied differently. For example, understanding emergence and the importance of analyzing a complex system requires us to think differently than we were taught. We want to take things apart and put them back together to understand them. To fully learn how a human being works requires both observing ourselves in action, in different environments, and also dissecting ourselves &ndash; literally and analytically.<br/><br/>Economists who deal with all this complexity want to simplify it into statistics, because to stare into a bucket full of stats is much easier than to analyze people in motion. Economists started us down a path based on a reaction to rising government spending. The politicians and economists wondered if, &ldquo;Our economy is becoming too dependent on government spending &ndash; what if we constrained the government&rsquo;s income &ndash; then it would have less to spend, and the growth in spending will slow.&rdquo; Seems logical, if I personally have less income, I spend less. So let&rsquo;s go down that path, and assuming we are a U.S. government adviser we could say, &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t raise taxes. If we do we will only accelerate spending. So to control our big growth in government, let&rsquo;s not raise our income (i.e., tax more) and that will constrain the rise in spending.&rdquo; From what I can see, that was the path we took as a country in 2000-2001.<br/><br/>In 1970 total Federal spending was $890 billion, in 2009 it increased by 299% to $3,551 billion. The average median income has risen only 27%, which creates a larger burden on taxpayers to fund government spending. Washington now spends around $30,000 per U.S. household &ndash; more than ever before. The logic of &ldquo;don&rsquo;t raise spending because it will slow growth in government spending&rdquo; seems a bit unhinged based on the evidence. Perhaps if we had raised taxes (and thus revenue) we would have just spent more. But the point is that the path (i.e., revenues will constrain spending) gained momentum, and now we find ourselves in a $1.6 trillion pickle. Had economists used complexity-emergentinterconnected analysis in their presentation, most likely they would have gotten lost in the river of complexity, and the U.S. would have used common sense and stayed on the path that kept us out of trouble for more than 200 years. What a concept to have spending and income match.<br/><br/><strong><em><a href="http://www.fimg.net/services">Investing</a> </em></strong><br/><br/>In April, Jeff Lokken, Barry Hyman and I conducted a webinar titled &ldquo;Kicking the Bricks&rdquo; about how we research companies, make investments, and assess management. Someone asked what we thought was the most important thing to think about as an investor. My instant response was to realize that everything is connected. We then talked about complexity and emergent systems. At FIM Group we don&rsquo;t oversimplify our process. It is important to have a disciplined approach that is rooted in a belief in emergent systems, the importance of humble scientific enquiry and common sense. All that takes time, and the real time is not just the enquiry into an investment&rsquo;s merits. It is the time it takes to nurture your education with experience. Luckily, however, there is a way to measure if all our analyses, work and experience have paid off &ndash; and that is results. Unlike most other investment firms, FIM Group publishes our actual performance statistics, not someone else&rsquo;s. We say, &ldquo;This is what our actual clients have earned,&rdquo; and we provide you with your portfolio&rsquo;s unobscured performance data. Our goal with our monthly newsletters is to help you have a better understanding of not only what, but why we do things here at FIM Group. We believe our performance comes because we humbly do a lot of little things right &hellip; and they add up to respectable performance. Humans are wired to want to oversimplify things that are inherently complex, but to oversimplify as an investor is to throw common sense out the door. The world is moving fast, and our webinars help us keep you informed in real-time, answering today&rsquo;s questions, so I invite you to participate in them whenever you can.<br/><br/><em>Note to FIM Group clients: What follows is my reaction to news that came across my Bloomberg wire about two hours after I finished the above article. </em><br/><br/><strong><em>Democracies Are Reactive Systems</em></strong><br/><br/>On April 18, Standard &amp; Poor&rsquo;s put a &ldquo;negative&rdquo; outlook on the United States&rsquo; AAA credit rating, citing a &ldquo;material risk&rdquo; if the nation&rsquo;s leaders fail to deal with rising budget deficits and debt. According to Bloomberg, S&amp;P said in a report, &ldquo;We believe there is a material risk that U.S. policy-makers might not reach an agreement on how to address medium- and long-term budgetary challenges by 2013.&rdquo; They went on to say that, &ldquo;If an agreement is not reached, and meaningful implementation does not begin by then, this would in our view render the U.S. fiscal profile meaningfully weaker than that of peer &lsquo;AAA&rsquo; sovereigns.&rdquo;<br/><br/>Where will the &ldquo;safe&rdquo; money go with the U.S. looking shaky? Certainly not into U.S. CDs or fixed annuities. Rather, we think it will migrate to countries that run their affairs with a bit more common sense. AAA sovereign debt in countries like Norway, Australia, Switzerland, Singapore and the United Kingdom, for example, could benefit from the possible U.S. downgrade. Is this &ldquo;credit watch&rdquo; a big deal? I think that the U.S. will use it as a rally cry to get our House, Senate and Oval Office to convince citizens that we need to fix the spending and revenue side of our fiscal budget. Democracies tend to be reactive systems &ndash; they wait until things get worse before they get on corrective course. Just ask Paul Volcker.</p>
<p><img width="0" style="display:none;border:0;" src="http://tracker.sendible.com/messages/a5bcf6d4-1b25-4ffc-8c0d-e005df88c3f4?service=Wordpress&#038;f=840198&#038;view=true" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whyisfinancialplanningimportant.net/wealth-management-advice/understanding-without-oversimplifying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

